| Sermon 6. Omnipotence in
        Bonds 
            "And He went down with them, and came to
            Nazareth; and was subject to them." Luke ii. 51. {75} AT this Christmas season, when we are celebrating
        those joyful mysteries which ushered in the Gospel, it
        seems almost an officious intrusion upon our holiday to
        engage in any exercise of the reason, even though it be
        in order to enliven the devotional feelings proper to the
        holy tide. It is a time of religious rest and spiritual
        festivity, and even on the ground that discussion is a
        kind of labour, we seem to have a right to be protected
        against it. And yet, as the days go on, and thankfulness
        has had free current and joy has had its fill, it seems
        allowable too, to look back at length on what has been
        occupying the heart, and to reason upon it. Nay, we seem
        to have the highest of possible authorities for doing so;
        for after two of the joyful mysteries, the third and the
        fifth, the holy Virgin is said to have done this very
        thing. Upon the {76} Nativity of our Lord and Saviour, the
        very feast we have been celebrating, the Evangelist tells
        us, "Mary kept all these words, pondering
        them in her heart"; and after she had found Him in
        the Temple in the midst of the Doctors, which is the
        subject of this day's Gospel, "His Mother," we
        are told, "kept all these words in her heart."
        Surely, then, it is permitted to me, consistently with
        the love and adoration due to this happy time of
        Christmas, to direct your minds, my Brethren, to a
        consideration which it suggests, not indeed very
        recondite, on the contrary, obvious to all of us, lying
        on the very face of the great Mystery, but adapted, I
        think, both to strengthen the faith and to deepen the
        love, with which we receive it into our hearts. "The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us;"
        this is the glorious, unsearchable, incomprehensible
        Truth, on which all our hopes for the future depend, and
        which we have now been commemorating. It is the wonderful
        Economy of Redemption, by which God became man, the
        Highest became the lowest, the Creator took His place
        among His own creatures, Power became weakness, and
        Wisdom looked to men like folly. He that was rich was
        made poor; the Lord of all was rejected: "He came
        unto His own, and His own received Him not." This, I
        say, is the grand mystery of the season, and this is the
        subject on which I now propose to make one remark. I say then, my Brethren, consider what the Divine
        Being is, and what we mean, when we use His name. The
        very first idea of Him, if we make the Creed our guide,
        is Omnipotence: "I believe in God, the Father {77} Almighty." And if you wish to enter into this idea
        of Omnipotence, and investigate what it is, trace it back
        into the further mystery of a past eternity. For ages
        innumerable, for infinite periods, long and long before
        any creature existed, He was. When there was no creature
        to exercise His power upon, still He was Omnipotent in
        His very Essence, as being not sovereign merely, but
        sole,as the One Being, without any greater, less,
        or equal, full of all resources within, and in need of
        nothing, and, though infinitely one, yet being, at the
        same time, a whole infinite universe, as I may say, in
        Himself;so much so that the breadth and depth and
        richness and variety and splendour of this created world
        which we behold, is simply nothing at all, compared to
        the vastness of that Ocean of perfection which lay
        concentrated in the intensity of His unity. A king of
        this world, though a sovereign, though an autocrat,
        depends on his subjects; but the Almighty God is
        absolutely and utterly free from any necessary alliance
        with His creatures. He is complete in Himself, for this
        reason, if for no other, that He existed for everlasting
        ages before any one of them was, and was able to do
        without them for a past eternity, and then created them
        all out of nothing. He borrows nothing from them; He owes
        nothing whatever even to the highest of them; they, on
        the contrary, owe it to Him that they are even able to
        remain in their own proper nature, and they derive from
        Him, moment by moment, every pulsation of their life and
        every ray of such glory as they possess. Such is the omnipotent, self-dependent God: fixed in
        His own centre, and needing no point of motion or {78} vantage-ground out of Himself, whereupon to bring into
        action, or to use, or to apply, His inexhaustible power.
        He can make, He can unmake; He can decree and bring to
        pass, He can direct, control, and resolve, absolutely
        according to His will. He could create this vast material
        world, with all its suns and globes, and its illimitable
        spaces, in a moment. All its overwhelming multiplicity of
        laws, and complexity of formations, and intricacy of
        contrivances, both to originate and to accomplish, is
        with Him but the work of a moment. He could destroy it
        all in all its parts in a moment; in the same one moment
        He could create another universe instead of it,
        indefinitely more vast, more beautiful, more marvellous,
        and indefinitely unlike that universe which He was
        annihilating. He could bring into existence and destroy
        an infinite series of such universes, each in succession
        more perfect than that which immediately preceded it. He
        is the Creator, too, of all the intellectual natures
        which exist, whether in the heavens above, or on the
        earth, or in the regions under the earth. Angels in their
        nine multitudinous orders, and men in their populous
        generations, good spirits and bad, saints and souls on
        trial, the saved and the lost, first, He created them and
        creates, each in its own time; and next, He keeps the
        complete and exact tale of them all, as He keeps the
        catalogue also of all the beasts, the birds, the fishes,
        the reptiles, and insects, all over the earth. Not a
        sparrow falls without Him; not a hair of our heads, but
        He has counted it in with the rest; and so, too, not a
        soul, but He has before Him its whole history from
        beginning to end, and its every thought, word, and deed,
        and its {79} every motion through every day, and its relative
        place in the scale of merit and of sin. And, while He thus intermingles His presence and His
        operations with an ineffable intimacy of union in every
        place, in every substance, in every act, everywhere, He
        is at the same time, as I have said, infinitely separated
        from everything, and absolutely incommunicable and
        unapproachable, and self-dependent in His own glorious
        Essence. Nothing can add to Him; no one can be His
        creditor, no one can claim anything of Him. He has no
        duties (if I may use such a term) towards the beings He
        has created. It is a saying about earthly possessions,
        that property has its duties as well as its privileges.
        Such words and such ideas apply not to the
        Self-subsisting, Everlasting God. He asks of His
        creatures, "Is it not lawful for Me to do what I
        will?" And St. Paul says of Him: "O man! who art thou
        that repliest against God? shall the thing formed say to
        Him who formed it, Why hast Thou made me thus?" If I
        must still use the word "duties" or obligations
        of Almighty God, I will say, that He has obligations
        towards Himself, but none towards us. What binds Him is
        the dictate of His own holy and perfect attributes. He is
        just and true, because His attributes are such; but we
        have no claims upon Him. Or, if we have claims, it is in
        consequence of His own gratuitous and express promise, by
        which indeed He does bind Himself; and then He is but
        faithful to His own word, because He is the Truth, and
        His obligation is still to Himself, and not to us. You
        know, my Brethren, we, in our turn, have no duties toward
        the brute creation; there is no {80} relation of justice
        between them and us. Of course we are bound not to treat
        them ill, for cruelty is an offence against that holy Law
        which our Maker has written on our hearts, and is
        displeasing to Him. But they can claim nothing at
        our hands; into our hands they are absolutely delivered.
        We may use them, we may destroy them at our pleasure, not
        our wanton pleasure, but still for our own ends, for our
        own benefit or satisfaction, provided we can give a
        rational account of what we do. Now, I do not say that
        the case is the same between us and our Maker, but it is
        illustrated by this parallel. He has no account at all to
        render to us: He has no claims of ours to settle: we are
        bound to Him; He is not bound to us, except as He binds
        Himself: we have no merit in His sight, and can do Him no
        service, unless His promise brings these ideas into
        existence. I say, He is only bound by His own perfect
        Nature, infinitely good, and holy, and true, as it is;
        and in that is the creature's stay. If we accuse Him, He
        will prevail, according to the text, "that Thou
        mayest be justified in Thy words, and mayest overcome
        when Thou art judged." And if we are utterly without
        claims upon Him as creatures, we are doubly destitute
        considered as sinners also: and thus, if even Angels are
        unprofitable in His sight, what are we? In the words of Holy Scripture [Job iv., ix., xv.,
        xxii., xxv., xxxiii.]: "Can a man be compared with
        God? What doth it profit God, if thou be just? or what
        dost thou give Him, if thy way be unspotted? Behold, even
        the moon doth not shine, and the stars are not pure in
        His sight. Behold, among His {81} saints, none is
        unchangeable, and the heavens are not pure in His sight.
        Behold, they that serve Him are not steadfast, and in His
        Angels He found wickedness. How much more is man
        abominable and unprofitable, who drinketh iniquity like
        water! Behold, He taketh away, and who can hinder Him?
        Who will say to Him: What dost Thou? Why dost thou strive
        against Him? for He giveth not account of any of His
        matters." Such is the Omnipotence, the Self-dependence, the
        Self-sufficiency, the infinite Liberty of the Eternal
        God, our Creator and Judge. And now, this being so, let
        me go on to the particular thought which I wish, my
        Brethren, to suggest to you for your reflection at this
        season. It is, not merely that God became man, not merely
        that the All-possessing became destitute; but the point
        on which I shall particularly insist is, in contrast with
        what I have been enlarging on, that the All-powerful, the
        All-free, the Infinite, became and becomes, as the text
        says, "subject" to the creature; nay, not only
        a subject, but literally a captive, a prisoner, and that
        not once, but on many different occasions and in many
        different ways. Now, observe, my Brethren, when the Eternal son of God
        came among us, He might have taken our nature, as Adam
        received it, from the earth, and have begun His human
        life at mature age; He might have been moulded under the
        immediate hand of the Creator; He need have known nothing
        of the feebleness of infancy or the slow growth of
        manhood. This might have been, {82} had He so willed; but no:
        He preferred the penance of taking His place in the line
        of Adam, and of being born of a woman. This was the very
        scandal of the ancient heretics, as it has been of
        free-thinkers in all ages. They shrank from the notion of
        such a birth from Mary, as a something simply intolerable
        and past belief; and truly in that belief is the
        commencement of the wonderful captivity of the Infinite
        God, on which I am to dwell. Yet I will not do more than
        suggest so much of it to your devout meditation. I mean
        the long imprisonment He had, before His birth, in the
        womb of the Immaculate Mary. There was He in His human
        nature, who, as God, is everywhere; there was He, as
        regards His human soul, conscious from the first with a
        full intelligence, and feeling the extreme irksomeness of
        the prison-house, full of grace as it was. At length He sees the light, and He is free; but free
        only in that His imprisonment is changed. The very first
        act of His Mother's on His birth, is both an example and
        a figure of His life-long captivity. "Mary brought
        forth her first-born Son, and wrapped Him up in swaddling
        clothes, and laid Him in a manger." It is the custom
        in those southern parts to treat the new-born babe in a
        way strange to this age and country. The infant is
        swathed around with cloths much resembling the
        winding-sheet, the bandages and ligaments of the dead.
        You may recollect, my Brethren, the account of Lazarus's
        revival; how that, when miracle had lifted him up out of
        the tomb, there he lay motionless, till his fastenings
        were cut off from him. "He that had been dead came
        forth, bound foot and hand with winding-bands; {83} and Jesus
        said to them: Loose him, and let him go." So was it
        with that wonder-working Lord Himself in His own infancy.
        He submitted to the customs, as well as to the ritual, of
        His nation; and, as He had lain so long in Mary's womb,
        so now again He left that sacred prison, only that her
        loving hands might manacle and fetter Him once more,
        inflicting on Him the special penance which He had
        chosen. And so, like some inanimate image of wood or
        stone, the All-powerful lies in the manger, or on her
        bosom, doubly helpless, both because His infancy is
        feeble, and because His bonds are strong. It is in this wise He was shown to the shepherds; thus
        He was worshipped by the wise men; thus He was presented
        in the Temple, taken up in Simeon's arms, hurried off to
        Egypt by night, His tender Mother adoring the while that
        abject captivity to which it was her awful duty to reduce
        Him. So His first months passed; and though, as time went
        on, He grew in stature, and burst His bonds, still
        through a slow and tedious advance did He enter on His
        adolescence. And then, when for a moment He anticipated
        His mission and sat down among the Doctors in the Temple,
        He was quickly recalled by His Mother's chiding, and went
        back again to her and Joseph, and, in the emphatic words
        of the text, was "subject unto them." It is
        said, He worked at His father's trade, not even yet His
        own master, and confined till the age of thirty to the
        limits of one city. And when at length the hour came for His breaking away
        from His humble home and quitting Nazareth, {84} even then
        this law of captivity, as I may call it, continued, and
        that even with the circumstances of a frightful
        development. For is it not terrifying, so as even to
        scare the mind, that in His infancy indeed His Mother's
        pure embrace had been His prison, but now, as a
        preparation for His public ministry, He is made over to
        His enemy, and undergoes the handling of the foul spirit himself! The rebel archangel, who would not be in
        subjection, who had assailed the throne of God, and had
        been cast out of heaven, he it is who now has got fast
        hold of the Eternal Word Incarnate, and is lifting Him
        up, and transporting Him according to his will; taking
        Him into the holy city, and setting Him upon the pinnacle
        of the Temple, and taking Him up into a very high
        mountain in order to seduce Him with a bribe of the
        unshackled lordship of the wide earth. "What concord
        hath Christ with Belial?" Yet the fiend is allowed
        the momentary possession of the Omnipotent. But at least when He has begun to preach, He will be
        free. My Brethren, it is true; but even then the
        threatenings at least and the earnests of a renewed
        captivity pursue Him. As soon as He does miracles and
        collects followers, His brethren take the alarm, and try
        to capture Him. "When His friends had heard of it,
        they went out to lay hold of Him, for they said, He is
        become mad." When He preached in Nazareth, "the
        people rose and seized Him violently, and brought Him to
        the brow of the hill, to cast Him headlong." At
        another time He was in danger from His own hearers; they
        went about to take Him by force to make Him a king. At
        another time, "the Scribes and Pharisees {85} sent
        ministers to apprehend Him." At another time, Herod
        was about to seize Him and put Him to death. At length He is to die for us; but still that
        sacrifice of Himself was not to please Him, if
        imprisonment was away. He allowed Himself, in the
        Church's words, "manibus tradi nocentium," to
        be given into the hands of the violent. Now, I ask, what
        need of this superfluity of humiliation? He was to shed
        His blood and die; doubtless: but in the manifold
        dispositions of Providence there were many ways whereby
        to die, without falling into the fierce handling of
        jailers and hangmen. He might have taken upon Himself the
        mode of satisfying the Divine Decree, and have dispensed
        with the instrumentality of man. We read in history of
        kings going to death, who refused the assistance of the
        executioner, and submitted to their fate by their own
        act. And it was in order to remind us that He  need not
        have undergone that profanation, that, on His enemies
        first approaching Him, He smote them to the ground. And
        again, it was in order to impress upon us that He  did
        undergo it, that He touchingly asked them: "Are ye
        come out as to a robber, with swords and clubs, to
        apprehend Me? but this is your hour and the power of
        darkness." Thus He spoke, and that expostulation was the
        immediate signal for those special indignities to begin
        in which He chose to invest His passion and death. He who
        was submitted to the wine-press in Gethsemani, and
        agonized with none to see Him but Apostles and attendant
        Angels, might surely have gone through His solemn
        sacrifice in solitude, as He commenced it; but {86} He
        preferred the "hands of men"; He preferred the
        loathsome kiss of the traitor; He preferred the staves
        and swords of the ministers of a fallen priesthood; He
        preferred to die in the midst of a furious mob, haling
        Him to and fro; under the fists and scourges and hammers
        of savage lictors; now shut up in a dungeon, now dragged
        before the judgment-seat, now tied to a pillar, now
        nailed to the cross, and then at length, when the worst
        was over, and His soul was fled, hurried, as the best His
        friends could do for Him, hurried into a narrow sepulchre
        of stone. O marvellous dispensation, full of mystery!
        that the God of Nature, the Lord of the Universe, should
        take to Himself a body to suffer and die in; not only so,
        but should not even allow Himself the birthright of man,
        should refuse to be master of His own limbs, and outgrow
        the necessity of a Mother's arms, only to present Himself
        to the tyrannous grasp of the heathen soldiers. And now surely, my Brethren, we are come to the end of
        these wonders. He tore open the solid rock; He rose from
        the tomb; He ascended on high; He is far off from the
        earth; He is safe from profanation; and the soul and
        body, which He assumed, partake of course, as far as
        created nature allows, of the Sovereign Freedom and the
        Independence of Omnipotence. It is not so: He is indeed
        beyond the reach of suffering; but you anticipate, my
        Brethren, what I have yet to say. Is He then so enamoured
        of the prison, that He should purpose to revisit earth
        again, in order that, as far as possible, He may undergo
        it still? Does He set such a value on subjection to His
        creatures, that, before He goes away, on the very {87} eve of
        His betrayal, He must actually make provision, after
        death, for perpetuating His captivity to the end of the
        world? My Brethren, the great truth is daily before our
        eyes: He has ordained the standing miracle of His Body
        and Blood under visible symbols, that He may secure
        thereby the standing mystery of Omnipotence in bonds. He took bread, and blessed, and made it His Body; He
        took wine, and gave thanks, and made it His Blood; and He
        gave His priests the power to do what He had done.
        Henceforth, He is in the hands of sinners once more.
        Frail, ignorant, sinful man, by the sacerdotal power
        given to him, compels the presence of the Highest; he
        lays Him up in a small tabernacle; he dispenses Him to a
        sinful people. Those who are only just now cleansed from
        mortal sin, open their lips for Him; those who are soon
        to return to mortal sin, receive Him into their breasts;
        those who are polluted with vanity and selfishness and
        ambition and pride, presume to make Him their guest; the
        frivolous, the tepid, the worldly-minded, fear not to
        welcome Him. Alas! alas! even those who wish to be more
        in earnest, entertain Him with cold and wandering
        thoughts, and quench that Love which would inflame them
        with Its own fire, did they but open to It. Such are the
        best of us; and then for the worst? O my Brethren, what
        shall we say of sacrilege? of His reception into hearts
        polluted with mortal, unforsaken sin? of those further
        nameless profanations, which from time to time occur,
        when unbelief dares to present itself at the Holy Altar,
        and blasphemously gains possession of Him? My Brethren, it is plain that, when we confess God {88} as
        Omnipotent only, we have gained but a half-knowledge of
        Him: His is an Omnipotence which can at the same time
        swathe Itself in infirmity and can become the captive of
        Its own creatures. He has, if I may so speak, the
        incomprehensible power of even making Himself weak. We
        must know Him by His names, Emmanuel and Jesus, to know
        Him perfectly. One word more before I conclude. Some persons may
        consider that a thought, such as that I have been
        enlarging on, is a difficulty to faith. Every one has his
        own trials and his own scandals: I grant it. For me, my
        Brethren, I can only say that its effect on myself lies
        just in the very opposite direction, and, awful as it is,
        it does but suggest an incentive, as for adoration, so
        for faith also. What human teacher could thus open for us
        an insight into the infinitude of the Divine Counsels?
        Eye of man hath not seen the face of God; and heart of
        man could never have conceived or invented so wonderful a
        manifestation, as the Gospel contains, of His ineffable,
        overwhelming Attributes. I believe the infinite
        condescension of the Highest to be true, because it has
        been imagined. Moreover, I recognize it to be true, just
        as I believe in the laws of this material world,
        according as human science elicits them; viz., because I
        see here the silent operation, beneath the surface, of a
        great principle, which is not seen till it is
        investigated. I adore a truth, which, though patent to
        all who look for it, yet, to be seen in its consistency
        and symmetry, has to be looked for. And further, I
        glory in it, for I see in it the most awful antagonism to
        the very idea and essence of sin, whether as existing in
        Angels or in men. For what was {89} the sin of Lucifer, but
        the resolve to be his own master? What was the sin of
        Adam, but impatience of subjection, and a desire to be
        his own god? What is the sin of all his children, but the
        movement, not of passion merely, not of selfishness, not
        of unbelief, but of pride, of the heart rising against
        the law of God, and set on being emancipated from its
        trammels? What is the sin of Antichrist, but, as St. Paul
        says, that of being "the Lawless One," of
        "opposing or being lifted up against all that is
        called God, or worshipped, so that he sitteth in the
        temple of God, showing himself as if he were God"?
        If, then, the very principle of sin is insubordination,
        is there not a stupendous meaning in the fact, that He,
        the Eternal, who alone is sovereign and supreme, has
        given us an example in His own Person of that love of
        subjection, which in Him alone is simply voluntary, but
        in all creatures is an elementary duty? O my Brethren, let us blush at our own pride and
        self-will. Let us call to mind our impatience at God's
        providences towards us, our wayward longings after what
        cannot be, our headstrong efforts to reverse His just
        decrees, our bootless conflicts with the stern
        necessities which hem us in, our irritation at ignorance
        or suspense about His will, our fierce, passionate
        wilfulness when we see that will too clearly, our haughty
        contempt of His ordinances, our determination to do
        things for ourselves without Him, our preference of our
        own reason to His word,the many, many shapes in
        which the Old Adam shows itself, and one or other of
        which our conscience tells us is our own; and let us pray
        Him who is independent of us all, yet who at this season
        became as {90} though our fellow and our servant, to teach us
        our place in His wide universe, and to make us ambitious
        only of that grace here and glory hereafter, which He has
        purchased for us by His own humiliation. (1st Sunday after Epiphany, 1857. Preached in the
        University Church, Dublin.) Top | Contents |
          Works | Home 
 Newman Reader  Works of John Henry NewmanCopyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
 |